Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: other routes
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for accessment.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Hepatic RNA synthesis in rats treated with ethylene thiourea
Author:
Austin GE, and Moyer GH
Year:
1979
Bibliographic source:
Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 23: 639-642.

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Animals (rats) received a single ip injection of ETU (2 doses) in DMSO.
One control group (DMSO).
GLP compliance:
not specified
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Imidazolidine-2-thione
EC Number:
202-506-9
EC Name:
Imidazolidine-2-thione
Cas Number:
96-45-7
Molecular formula:
C3H6N2S
IUPAC Name:
imidazolidine-2-thione
Details on test material:
ETU was a gift from Rohm and Haas, Co., Philadelphia, Pa.

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Simonsen, Gilroy, Ca.
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: 130-200 g
- Fasting period before study: 16h
- Housing: no data
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): of wayne meal
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): no data
- Acclimation period: no data


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): no data
- Humidity (%): no data
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
intraperitoneal
Vehicle:
DMSO
Details on exposure:
no
Doses:
2.5 and 250mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
4-7 animals / dose
Control animals:
yes
Details on study design:
[3H]orotic acid was given 60 min later ETU. Ninety minutes later this administration, the rats were decapited.
Then rates of hepatic RNA synthesis were determined.
Statistics:
no data

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LD0
Effect level:
250 mg/kg bw
Remarks on result:
other: no toxicity observed
Mortality:
No data
Clinical signs:
No clinical signs of toxicity were seen in animals receiving a single injection of ETU (at low or high dosage).
Body weight:
No data
Gross pathology:
The livers of treated rats were grossly and histologically normal at time of sacrifice.
Other findings:
An injection of a low or high dose of ETU produces no significant alteration relative to controls in the pulse labeling of nuclear or cytoplasmic RNA.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
In the present case, the lack of inhibition of RNA synthesis by ETU suggests that ETU and its metabolites may not alter cellular metabolism.
Executive summary:

Animals (rats) received a single ip injection of ETU (2 doses) in DMSO. DL0 was 250 mg/kg. In the present case, the lack of inhibition of RNA synthesis by ETU suggests that ETU and its metabolites may not alter cellular metabolism.