Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information


In an in vivo skin irritation assay conducted in accordance with OECD Test Guideline 404 and to GLP, Gasir was considered to be non-irritating to skin.


 


Based on an in vivo eye irritation study, conducted in accordance with OECD Test Guideline 405 and to GLP, Gasir is considered to be non-irritant to eye according to CLP.


 


No relevant respiratory tract irritation data were identified.


Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
Méthode B4 de la Directive de la Commission 2004/73/CE.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: David Perceval Ltd, Moston; Sandbach, Cheshire, UK
- Age at study initiation:12-20 weeks
- Weight at study initiation:2-3.5kg
- Housing: individually in suspended cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period:5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17-23°C
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr):15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12hrs dark/12hrs light

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
other: clipped
Vehicle:
other: 0,5 ml distilled water
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
500 mg
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 h
Observation period:
72 hours
Number of animals:
3
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: no data
- % coverage:no data
- Type of wrap if used: an elasticated corset

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done):gentle swabbing with cotton wool soaked in 74% Industrial Methylated Spirits
- Time after start of exposure: 4h

SCORING SYSTEM:Draize
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
(mean score 2)
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
(mean score 3)
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Max. score:
0
Remarks on result:
other: Max. duration: d; Max. value at end of observation period: (related to all animals)
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
(mean score 1)
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
(mean score 2)
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
(mean score 3)
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Max. score:
0
Remarks on result:
other: Max. duration: d; Max. value at end of observation period: (related to all animals)
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No evidence of skin irritation was noted during the study
Other effects:
Red/brown coloured staining was noted at all treated skin sites througout the study. The staining did not affect evaluation of skin responses.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test material produced a primary irritation index of 0.0 and was classified as non-irritant to rabbit skin according to the Draize classification scheme. No corrosive effects were noted.
Executive summary:

Introduction. The study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test material to the skin of the New Zealand White rabbit. The method was designed to meet the requirements of the following:

  • OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 404 “Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion” (adopted 24 April 2002)
  • Method B4 Acute Toxicity (Skin Irritation) of Commission Directive 2004/73/EC

Results. A single 4-hour, semi-occluded application of the test material to the intact skin of three

rabbits produced no evidence of skin irritation.

Conclusion. The test material produced a primary irritation index of 0.0 and was classified as non-irritant to rabbit skin according to the Draize classification scheme. No corrosive effects were noted.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Méthode B5 de la Directive de la Commission 2004/73/CE.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: David Perceval Ltd, Moston; Sandbach, Cheshire, UK
- Age at study initiation:12-20 weeks
- Weight at study initiation:2-3.5kg
- Housing: individually in suspended cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period:5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17-23°C
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr):15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12hrs dark/12hrs light

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: In one animal, one eye was treated, the other was the control
Amount / concentration applied:
100mg
Duration of treatment / exposure:
72h
Observation period (in vivo):
72h
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 1h
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 48h, 72h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 1h
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
48 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: 1h
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
48 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Reversibility of any observed effect: Changes fully reversible within 3 days
Other effects:
Dark red-coloured residual test material was noted in all treated eyes at the 1-hour observation and in one treated eye at the 24-hour observation.
Dark red-coloured staining of the fur was noted around all treated eyes during the study.


Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Remarks:
According to the CLP regulation the classification criteria for eye irritation applicable to the OECD 405 test data (Table 3.3.2) are not met
Conclusions:
The test material produced a maximum group mean score of 6.0 and was classified as a MILD IRRITANT (CLASS 4 ON A 1 TO 8 SCALE) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system.

According to the CLP regulation, the classification criteria for eye irritation applicable to the OECD 405 test data (Table 3.3.2) are not met

 
  
Executive summary:

Introduction. The study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test material to the eye of the New Zealand White rabbit. The method was designed to meet the requirements of the following:

  • OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 405 “Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion” (adopted 24 April 2002)
  • Method B5 Acute Toxicity (Eye Irritation) of Commission Directive 2004/73/EC

Result. A single application of the test material to the non-irrigated eye of three rabbits produced minimal conjunctival irritation. Two treated eyes appeared normal at the 48-hour observation and the remaining treated eye appeared normal at the 72-hour observation.

Conclusion.

The test material produced a maximum group mean score of 6.0 and was classified as a mild irritant (Class 4 on a 1 to 8 scale) to the rabbit eye according to a modified

Kay and Calandra classification system.

According to the CLP regulation, the classification criteria for eye irritation applicable to the OECD 405 test data (Table 3.3.2) are not met

 

Table 3.3 2Eye irritation

Category

Criteria

Category 2

 

Substances that produce in at least in 2 of 3 tested animals, a positive

response of:

(a) corneal opacity1 and/or

(b) iritis ≥ 1, and/or

(c) conjunctival redness ≥ 2 and/or

(d) conjunctival oedema (chemosis) ≥ 2

calculated as the mean scores following grading at 24, 48 and 72 hours after installation of the test material, and which fully reverses within an observation period of 21 days

 

  

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

No respiratory tract irritation data were identified. A study was not conducted as it is not a REACH Standard Information Requirement.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the results of the available and reliable in vivo skin irritation study, there is no requirement to classify Gasir 1 for skin irritation under EU CLP. 

Based on the results of the available and reliable in vivo eye irritation study, there is no requirement to classify Gasir 1 for eye irritation according to EU CLP criteria (EC 1272/2008).