Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

All criteria for a valid study were met as described in the protocol. The results of the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay indicate that, under the conditions of this study, EA 100 did cause a positive mutagenic response with tester strain TA100 and TA1535 in the presence and absence of S9 activation and with tester strain WP2 uvrA in the presence of S9 activation. The study was concluded to be positive without conducting a confirmatory (independent repeat) assay because the results were clearly positive; hence, no further testing was warranted.

Under the conditions of the assay described in this report, EA 100 was concluded to be positive for the induction of forward mutations at the thymidine kinase locus in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells, in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system, in the in vitro L5178Y/TK+/- mouse lymphoma assay.

Under the conditions of the assay described in this report, EA 100 was concluded to be positive for the induction of structural chromosomal aberrations and negative for the induction of numerical chromosomal aberrations in the non-activated and S9-activated test systems in the in vitro mammalian chromosomal aberration test using CHO cells.

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Vehicle / solvent:
DMSO
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
methylmethanesulfonate
other: 2-aminoanthracene
Evaluation criteria:
All Salmonella tester strain cultures must demonstrate the presence of the deep rough mutation (rfa) and the deletion in the uvrB gene. Cultures of tester strains TA98 and TA100 must demonstrate the presence of the pKM101 plasmid R-factor. All WP2 uvrA cultures must demonstrate the deletion in the uvrA gene.
All cultures must demonstrate the characteristic mean number of spontaneous revertants in the vehicle controls as follows (inclusive): TA98, 10 - 50; TA100, 80 - 240; TA1535, 5 - 45; TA1537, 3 - 21; WP2 uvrA, 10 - 60.

To ensure that appropriate numbers of bacteria are plated, tester strain culture titers must be greater than or equal to 0.3x109 cells/mL.
The mean of each positive control must exhibit at least a 3.0-fold increase in the number of revertants over the mean value of the respective vehicle control.
A minimum of three non-toxic dose levels is required to evaluate assay data. A dose level is considered toxic if one or both of the following criteria are met: (1) A >50 % reduction in the mean number of revertants per plate as compared to the mean vehicle control value. This reduction must be accompanied by an abrupt dose-dependent drop in the revertant count. (2) At least a moderate reduction in the background lawn (background code 3, 4 or 5).
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
positive
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
positive
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
positive
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Conclusions:
All criteria for a valid study were met as described in the protocol. The results of the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay indicate that, under the conditions of this study, EA 100 did cause a positive mutagenic response with tester strain TA100 and TA1535 in the presence and absence of S9 activation and with tester strain WP2 uvrA in the presence of S9 activation. The study was concluded to be positive without conducting a confirmatory (independent repeat) assay because the results were clearly positive; hence, no further testing was warranted.
Executive summary:

The test substance, EA 100, was tested to evaluate its mutagenic potential by measuring its ability to induce reverse mutations at selected loci of several strains of Salmonella typhimurium and at the tryptophan locus of Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as the vehicle.

In the preliminary toxicity assay, the dose levels tested were 6.67, 10.0, 33.3, 66.7, 100, 333, 667, 1000, 3333 and 5000 μg per plate. No precipitate was observed. Toxicity was observed beginning at 1000 to 5000 μg per plate with most conditions. Based upon these results, the maximum doses tested in the mutagenicity assay were 5000 μg per plate (for tester strains TA98, TA1537 and WP2 uvrA in the presence and absence of S9 activation and for tester strains TA100 and TA1535 in the presence of S9 activation) and 1000 μg per plate (for tester strains TA100 and TA1535 in the absence of S9 activation).

In the mutagenicity assay, the dose levels tested were 5.00, 15.0, 50.0, 100, 300 and 1000 μg per plate (for tester strains TA100 and TA1535 in the absence of S9 activation) 50.0, 150, 500, 1000, 1500, 3000 and 5000 μg per plate (for tester strains TA100, TA1535 and WP2 uvrA in the presence of S9 activation) and 15.0, 50.0, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg per plate (for tester strains TA98 and TA1537 in the presence and absence of S9 activation and WP2 uvrA in the absence of S9 activation). No precipitate was observed. Toxicity was observed at 5000 μg per plate with some conditions. Positive mutagenic responses were observed (6.7 to 50.3-fold, maximum increase) with tester strains TA100, TA1535 in the presence and absence of S9 activation and WP2 uvrA in the presence of S9 activation.

These results indicate EA 100 was positive for the ability to induce reverse mutations at selected loci of two strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA100, TA1535) in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system and at the tryptophan locus of Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA in the presence of an exogenous metabolic activation system.

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 490 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests Using the Thymidine Kinase Gene)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian cell transformation assay
Target gene:
thymidine kinase
Species / strain / cell type:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Non-activated 4 hours 0.325, 0.65, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 15 and 50
Non-activated 24 hours 0.081, 0.163, 0.325, 0.65, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10
S9-activated 4 hours 7.5, 15, 25, 50, 60, 65, 75 and 100

Based upon the results of the preliminary toxicity assay
Vehicle / solvent:
DMSO
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
methylmethanesulfonate
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
The preparation and addition of the test substance dose formulations was carried out under filtered lighting during the exposure period. Treatment was carried out by combining 100 μL of test substance dose formulation, vehicle or positive control dose formulation and F0P medium or S9 mix (as appropriate) with 6 x 10^6 L5178Y/TK+/- cells in a total volume of 10 mL. All pH adjustments were performed prior to adding S9 or target cells to the treatment medium. Each S9-activated 10-mL culture contained 4 mL S9 mix (final S9 concentration of 1.0%). Cultures were capped tightly and incubated with mechanical mixing at 37 ± 1°C for 4 or 24 hours.

For the preliminary toxicity assay only, after a 4-hour treatment in the presence and absence of S9, cells were washed with culture medium and cultured in suspension for two days post-treatment, with cell concentration adjustment on the first day. After a 24-hour treatment in the absence of S9, cells were washed with culture medium and immediately readjusted to 3 x 105 cells/mL. Cells were then cultured in suspension for an additional two days post-treatment with cell concentration adjustment on the first day.

For the definitive assay only, at the end of the exposure period, the cells were washed with culture medium and collected by centrifugation. The cells were resuspended in 20 mL F10P on Day 1 and in 10 mL F10P on Day 2, and incubated at 37 ± 1°C for two days following treatment. Cell population adjustments to 3 x 10^5 cells/mL were made as follows:
• 4 hour treatment – 1 and 2 days after treatment.
• 24 hour treatment – immediately after test substance removal, and 2 and 3 days after treatment.
Evaluation criteria:

• A result was considered positive if a concentration-related increase in mutant frequency was observed in the treated cultures and one or more treatment conditions with 10% or greater total growth exhibited induced mutant frequencies of ≥90 mutants/10^6 clonable cells (based on the average mutant frequency of duplicate cultures). If the average vehicle control mutant frequency was >90 mutants/10^6 clonable cells, a doubling of mutant frequency over the vehicle would also be required (Mitchell et al., 1997).
• A result was considered negative if the treated cultures exhibited induced mutant frequencies of less than 90 mutants/10^6 clonable cells (based on the average mutant frequency of duplicate cultures) and there was no concentration-related increase in mutant frequency.
Key result
Species / strain:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
positive
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the assay described in this report, EA 100 was concluded to be positive for the induction of forward mutations at the thymidine kinase locus in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells, in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system, in the in vitro L5178Y/TK+/- mouse lymphoma assay.
Executive summary:

The test substance, EA 100, was evaluated for its ability to induce forward mutations at the thymidine kinase locus in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as the vehicle.

In the preliminary toxicity assay, the concentrations tested were 7.81, 15.6, 31.3, 62.5, 125, 250, 500, 1000 and 2000 μg/mL. The maximum concentration evaluated was the limit dose for this assay. Visible precipitate was observed at concentrations ≥500 μg/mL at the beginning of treatment and at concentrations ≥1000 μg/mL by the end of treatment at all concentrations. Relative suspension growth (RSG) was 21% at a concentration of 62.5 μg/mL (4-hour treatment with S9). RSG was or approximated 0% at all higher concentrations using a 4-hour treatment with S9 and at all concentrations using a 4-hour treatment without S9 and 24-hour treatment without S9. Based upon these results, the concentrations chosen for the definitive mutagenicity assay were 7.5, 15, 25, 50, 60, 65, 75 and 100 μg/mL (4-hour treatment with S9), 0.325, 0.65, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 15 and 50 μg/mL (4-hour treatment without S9) and 0.081, 0.163, 0.325, 0.65, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 μg/mL (24-hour treatment without S9).

In the initial definitive mutagenicity assay, no visible precipitate was observed at the beginning or end of treatment. Cultures treated at concentrations of 15, 25 and 60 μg/mL (4-hour treatment with S9), 0.325, 0.65 and 1.25 μg/mL (4-hour treatment without S9) and 0.163, 0.325, 0.65 and 1.25 μg/mL (24-hour treatment without S9) exhibited 48 to 110%, 50 to 86% and 49 to 91% RSG, respectively, and were cloned. Relative total growth of the cloned cultures ranged from 22 to 121% (4-hour treatment with S9), 28 to 98% (4-hour treatment without S9) and 30 to 73% (24-hour treatment without S9). Cultures treated at other concentrations were discarded prior to cloning because a sufficient number of other concentrations was available or due to excessive toxicity or were excluded from evaluation of mutagenicity due to excessive toxicity. Increases in induced mutant frequency ≥90 mutants/106 clonable cells were observed at concentrations ≥0.65 μg/mL using a 24-hour treatment without S9. The assay was retested to obtain a minimum of 4 non-toxic surviving concentrations following the 4-hour treatments with and without S9. Based upon these results, the concentrations chosen for the first retest of the definitive mutagenicity assay were the same as the initial definitive mutagenicity assay for the 4-hour treatment with S9 and 0.08, 0.16, 0.31, 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 15 μg/mL for the 4-hour treatment without S9.

In the first retest of the definitive mutagenicity assay, no visible precipitate was observed at the beginning or end of treatment. Cultures treated at concentrations of 15, 25 and 50 μg/mL (4-hour treatment with S9) and 0.16, 0.31, 0.63 and 1.25 μg/mL (4-hour treatment without S9) exhibited 35 to 99% and 45 to 107% RSG, respectively, and were cloned. Relative total growth of the cloned cultures ranged from 11 to 95% (4-hour treatment with S9) and 21 to 90% (4-hour treatment without S9). Cultures treated at other concentrations were discarded prior to cloning because a sufficient number of other concentrations was available or due to excessive toxicity or were excluded from evaluation of mutagenicity due to excessive toxicity. Increases in induced mutant frequency ≥90 mutants/106 clonable cells were observed at concentrations ≥0.31 μg/mL using a 4-hour treatment without S9. Predominance of small colonies is indicative of a potential clastogenic mechanism of action. The assay was retested to obtain a minimum of 4 non-toxic surviving concentrations following the 4-hour treatment with S9. Based upon these results, the concentrations chosen for the final retest of the definitive mutagenicity assay were 1, 3, 7.5, 15, 25, 45, 50, 60, 65, 75 and 100 μg/mL using a 4-hour treatment with S9.

In the final retest of the definitive mutagenicity assay, no visible precipitate was observed at the beginning or end of treatment. Cultures treated at concentrations of 1, 3, 7.5, 15, 25 and 45 μg/mL exhibited 44 to 102% RSG, and were cloned. Relative total growth of the cloned cultures ranged from 21 to 122%. Cultures treated at other concentrations were discarded prior to cloning because a sufficient number of other concentrations was available or due to excessive toxicity or were excluded from evaluation of mutagenicity due to excessive toxicity. Increases in induced mutant frequency ≥90 mutants/106 clonable cells were observed at concentrations ≥25 μg/mL. Predominance of small colonies is indicative of a potential clastogenic mechanism of action.

These results indicate EA 100 was positive for the ability to induce forward mutations at the thymidine kinase locus in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells, in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system.

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Treatment Condition Treatment Time Recovery Time Doses (μg/mL)
Non-activated 4 hr 16 hr 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12.5, 15, 20
20 hr 0 hr 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
S9-activated 4 hr 16 hr 10, 20, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80,100
Vehicle / solvent:
DMSO
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
methylmethanesulfonate
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells (repository number CCL 61) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA. In order to assure the karyotypic stability of the cell line, working cell stocks were not used beyond passage 15. The frozen lot of cells was tested using the Hoechst staining procedure and found to be free of mycoplasma contamination. This cell line has an average cell cycle time of 10-14 hours with a modal chromosome number of 20. The use of CHO cells has been demonstrated to be an effective method of detection of chemical clastogens (Preston et al., 1981).
Evaluation criteria:
The test substance was considered to have induced a positive response if
• at least one of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase when compared with the concurrent negative control (p ≤ 0.05), and
• the increase is concentration-related (p ≤ 0.05), and
• results are outside the 95% control limit of the historical negative control data.
The test substance was considered to have induced a clear negative response if none of the criteria for a positive response were met.
Key result
Species / strain:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the assay described in this report, EA 100 was concluded to be positive for the induction of structural chromosomal aberrations and negative for the induction of numerical chromosomal aberrations in the non-activated and S9-activated test systems in the in vitro mammalian chromosomal aberration test using CHO cells.
Executive summary:

The test substance, EA 100, was tested to evaluate the potential to induce structural chromosomal aberrations using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells in both the absence and presence of an of an exogenous metabolic activation system. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as the vehicle.

In the preliminary toxicity assay, the doses tested ranged from 0.5 to 5000 μg/mL, which was the limit dose for this assay. Cytotoxicity (≥ 50% reduction in cell growth index relative to the vehicle control) was observed at doses ≥ 15 μg/mL in the non-activated 4-hour exposure group; at doses ≥ 150 μg/mL in the S9-activated 4-hour exposure group; and at doses ≥ 5 μg/mL in the non-activated 20-hour exposure group. At the conclusion of the treatment period, visible precipitate was observed at doses ≥ 500 μg/mL in all three exposure groups. Based upon these results, the doses chosen for the chromosomal aberration assay ranged from 0.5 to 20 μg/mL for the non-activated 4-hour exposure group, from 10 to 100 μg/mL for the S9-activated 4-hour exposure group, and from 0.5 to 8 μg/mL for the non-activated 20-hour exposure group.

In the chromosomal aberration assay, cytotoxicity (55 ± 5% reduction in cell growth index relative to the vehicle control), was observed at doses ≥ 10 μg/mL in the non-activated 4-hour exposure group; at 100 μg/mL in the S9-activated 4-hour exposure group; and at doses ≥ 5 μg/mL in the non-activated 20-hour exposure group. The doses selected for evaluation of chromosomal aberrations were 2, 6, and 10 μg/mL for the non-activated 4-hour exposure group; 20, 50, and 100 μg/mL for the S9-activated 4-hour exposure group; and 1, 2, and 5 μg/mL for the non-activated 20-hour exposure group.

In the non-activated 4-hour exposure group, statistically significant and dose-dependent increases in structural aberrations (13.3%, 25.3%, and 19.3%) were observed at doses 2, 6, and 10 μg/mL, respectively (p ≤ 0.01; Fisher’s Exact test and p ≤ 0.05; Cochran-Armitage test).

In the S9-activated 4-hour exposure group, statistically significant and dose-dependent increases in structural aberrations (5.0% and 20.7%) were observed at doses 50 and 100 μg/mL, respectively (p ≤ 0.01; Fisher’s Exact test and p ≤ 0.05; Cochran-Armitage test).

In the non-activated 20-hour exposure group, statistically significant and dose-dependent increases in structural aberrations (11.7% and 20.7%) were observed at doses 2 and 5 μg/mL, respectively (p ≤ 0.01; Fisher’s Exact test and p ≤ 0.05; Cochran-Armitage test).

No significant or dose-dependent increases in numerical (polyploid or endoreduplicated cells) aberrations were observed in treatment groups with or without S9 (p > 0.05; Fisher’s Exact and Cochran-Armitage tests).

These results indicate EA 100 was positive for the induction of structural chromosomal aberrations and negative for the induction of numerical chromosomal aberrations in the presence and absence of the exogenous metabolic activation system.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (positive)

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification