Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
98 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
1 091 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
acute toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
other: see discussion below and attached documentation to this record
Overall assessment factor (AF):
9
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
LOAEC
Value:
9 824 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

An acute inhalation DNEL needs to be derived as the substance is classified for acute toxicity by the inhalation route. No suitable data is available, therefore a value for the systemic route therefore a value is derived by route to route extrapolation from the a LOAEL is based on the data from human poisoning incidents by the oral route. Of those values reported, the lowest estimated dose was 400mg/kg, which produced adverse but reversible symptoms. Route to route extrapolation can then be performed as shown:

Assume 5m3 inhaled over 4hrs exposure - half of normal workday exposure estimate of 10m3 over 8hrs, table R.8 -2, 57% absorption efficiency, 70kg worker = 9824mg/m3. (=400x70/5/0.57) (Inhalation absorption efficiency based on work of Johansson, 1986 - see chapter 7.1.1) Note that the theoretical inhalation figure used as the starting poin is above the saturated vapour concentration.

AF for dose response relationship:
3
Justification:
LOAEL to NOAEL extrapolation
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
not required, human data
AF for other interspecies differences:
1
Justification:
not required, human data
AF for intraspecies differences:
3
Justification:
See document attached to this record.
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
default
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
default

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
246 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
irritation (respiratory tract)
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
Most sensitive endpoint:
skin irritation/corrosion
Route of original study:
Dermal
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Most sensitive endpoint:
skin irritation/corrosion

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

Additional information - workers

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
59 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
426 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
acute toxicity
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
other: see discussion below and attached documentation to this record
Overall assessment factor (AF):
15
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
LOAEC
Value:
12 760 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

An acute inhalation DNEL needs to be derived as the substance is classified for acute toxicity by the inhalation route. No suitable data is available, therefore a value for the systemic route therefore a value is derived by route to route extrapolation from the a LOAEL is based on the data from human poisoning incidents by the oral route. Of those values reported, the lowest estimated dose was 400mg/kg, which produced adverse but reversible symptoms. Route to route extrapolation can then be performed as shown:

 Assume 3.33m3 inhaled over 4hrs exposure - one sixth of consumer exposure estimate of 20m3 over 24hrs, table R-8.2, 57% absorption efficiency, 60kg consumer = 12760mg/m3. (=400x60/3.3/0.57) (Inhalation absorption efficiency based on work of Johansson, 1986 - see chapter 7.1.1) Note that this starting point is well in excess of the saturated vapour concentration.

AF for dose response relationship:
3
Justification:
LOAEL->NOAEL
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
not required, human data
AF for other interspecies differences:
1
Justification:
not required, human data
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
See attached document
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
default
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
default

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
147 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
irritation (respiratory tract)
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Most sensitive endpoint:
skin irritation/corrosion

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
6.3 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
other: see discussion below and attached documentation to this record
Overall assessment factor (AF):
10.9
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
LOAEL
Value:
69 mg/kg bw/day
AF for dose response relationship:
3
Justification:
LOAEL to NOAEL. There is evidence to suggest that the NOAEL is only a little less than the LOAEL
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
1
Justification:
No factor is used for study length as the data shows that the severity of effect does not increase from 90 days to lifetime exposure.
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
7.2
Justification:
For the oral route, the LOAEL (69mg/kg from the NTP key repeat dose oral study in mice - see chapter 7.5.1) is equivalent to a human dose of 9.5mg/kg (based on extrapolation using the PBPK model - see chapter 7.1.1 of IUCLID). This accounts for toxicokinetic effects. This is converted into an allometric scaling factor of 7.25
AF for other interspecies differences:
0.1
Justification:
based on lower sensitivity of humans to key effect of haemolysis. See IUCLID chapter 7.9.3.
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
See document attached to this record
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
default
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
default
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
26.7 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
acute toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
other: see discussion below and attached documentation to this record
Overall assessment factor (AF):
15
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
LOAEL
Value:
400 mg/kg bw/day
AF for dose response relationship:
3
Justification:
LOAEL to NOAEL
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
not required, human data
AF for other interspecies differences:
1
Justification:
not required, human data
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
See document attached to this record
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
default
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
default

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

Additional information - General Population