Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 421-450-8 | CAS number: 154702-15-5
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Data is from test report
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- other: other: Information from migrated NONS file, as per inquiry number 06-2120017060-79-0000, permission to refer granted by ECHA
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 996
- Report date:
- 1996
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guidelines 406 EEC B.6 method, Section 4.1.7, Maximization test according to Magnusson and Kligman.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Data is from test report
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 421-450-8
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 154702-15-5
- Molecular formula:
- C44H59N7O5
- IUPAC Name:
- Bis(2-ethylhexyl) 4,4’-{6-[4-tert-butylcarbamoyl)anilino]-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diyldiimino}dibenzoate
- Reference substance name:
- bis(2-ethylhexyl) 4,4’-{6-[4-tert-butylcarbamoyl) anilino]-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diyldiimino}dibenzoate
- IUPAC Name:
- bis(2-ethylhexyl) 4,4’-{6-[4-tert-butylcarbamoyl) anilino]-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diyldiimino}dibenzoate
- Details on test material:
- CAS No: 154702-15-5
Chemical Name: bis(2-ethylhexyl) 4,4’-{6-[4-tert-butylcarbamoyl) anilino]-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diyldiimino}dibenzoate
Nature of chemical: Organic
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Sex:
- not specified
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- maize oil
- Concentration / amount:
- Concentration of test material and vehicle used at induction: SInce an irritating concentration could not be obtained during the preliminary stage, it was decided to pretreat the induction test site with 10% SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE solution in vaseline.
The following concentrations of test material were used at induction: (1st phase INTRADERMAL INJECTIONS)
1) FCA (Freund's complete adjuvant) 1:1 diluted with isotonic saline
2) RA3643 in maize oil (3% dilution)
3) 3% dilutio of RA3643 in maize oil and FCA/Saline 1:1 4)
After 1 week topical application of 30% RA3643 in vaseline
Concentration of test material and vehicle used for each challenge: Challenge treatment (14 days after induction) by topical application of a 30% dilution of RA3643 in vaseline and of vaseline alone.
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- maize oil
- Concentration / amount:
- Concentration of test material and vehicle used at induction: SInce an irritating concentration could not be obtained during the preliminary stage, it was decided to pretreat the induction test site with 10% SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE solution in vaseline.
The following concentrations of test material were used at induction: (1st phase INTRADERMAL INJECTIONS)
1) FCA (Freund's complete adjuvant) 1:1 diluted with isotonic saline
2) RA3643 in maize oil (3% dilution)
3) 3% dilutio of RA3643 in maize oil and FCA/Saline 1:1 4)
After 1 week topical application of 30% RA3643 in vaseline
Concentration of test material and vehicle used for each challenge: Challenge treatment (14 days after induction) by topical application of a 30% dilution of RA3643 in vaseline and of vaseline alone.
- No. of animals per dose:
- Number of animals in test group: 10
Number of animals in negative control group: 6 - Positive control substance(s):
- no
Results and discussion
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 30 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 30 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 30 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 30 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 30 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 6
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 6.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 30 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 6
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 6.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 30 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 6
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 6.0.
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 30 %
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 6
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 30 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 6.0.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Maximum concentration not causing irritating effects in preliminary test: 30 %
Signs of irritation during induction:
The topical pretreatment with sodium lauryl sulphate induced slight erythema in the controls and test animals. After the 48-hour topical application of the patches loaded with vaseline only, slight signs of skin irritation were observed in the controls. In the test animals also sligth signs of skin irritation were observed after the 48-hour topical application of the 30% dilution test substance.
Evidence of sensitisation of each challenge concentration: Neither at 24 hours nor at 48 hours after the challenge treatment did the 30% test dilution in vaseline or Vaseline alone induced skin reactions in test animals and controls.
Other observations:
None of the test animals reacted positively. Therefore the test substance in considered NOT to be a SENSITIZER. Since clear and unequivocal results were obtained in this study, no need for further examination in an additional batch of test and control animals in required.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The test material shows no sensitization effect (negative result) in the New Zealand White rabbit maximisation test.
- Executive summary:
The test material shows no sensitization effect (negative result) in the New Zealand White rabbit maximisation test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
