Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 222-883-3 | CAS number: 3648-18-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26 March 2002 to 10 April 2002
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to valid guidelines and the study was conducted under GLP conditions. Since the study was conducted with the read across substance, dioctyltin oxide (DOTO), it has been assigned a reliability score of 2.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 002
- Report date:
- 2002
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Dioctyltin oxide
- EC Number:
- 212-791-1
- EC Name:
- Dioctyltin oxide
- Cas Number:
- 870-08-6
- Molecular formula:
- C16H34OSn
- IUPAC Name:
- Stannane, dioctyloxo-
- Test material form:
- solid: crystalline
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: Powder, white crystalline.
- Storage condition of test material: -20 °C in the dark.
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine requirement in the Salmonella typhimurium strains.
Tryptophan requirement in the Escherichia coli strain.
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Stored as nutrient broth cultures with 7.4 % DMSO at <60 °C.
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: rfa-, uvrB-, +R-factor
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Stored as nutrient broth cultures with 7.4 % DMSO at <60 °C.
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: rfa+, uvrA-, -R-factor
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Range finding test: 0, 0.3, 0.8, 2.3, 7, 21, 62, 185, 556, 1667 and 5000 µg/plate.
Definitive test: 0, 62, 185, 556, 1667 and 5000 µg/plate. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Methanol.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- methanol
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea and 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation).
2 mL molten top agar (0.6 % agar, 0.5 % NaCl and 0.05 mM L-histidine.HCl/0.05 mM biotin for the S. typhimurium stains, and supplemented with 0.05 mM tryptophane for the E.coli WP2 uvrA strain), maintained at 46 °C. 0.1 mL of culture of the appropriate strain, 0.1 mL of the appropriate test material solution, or the solvent or positive control substance and 0.5 mL S9-mix for the plates with metabolic activation or 0.5 mL sodium phosphate 100 mM (pH 7.4) for without metabolic activation. The ingredients were thoroughly mixed and the mix was immediately poured onto minimal glucose agar plates (1.5 % agar in Vogel and Bonner medium E with 2 % glucose).
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48-72 hours at 37 °C.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: The tests were performed in triplicate.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Cytotoxicity was assessed as a reduction in the number of revertant colonies and/or a clearing of the background lawn of bacterial growth. - Evaluation criteria:
- The mutagenicity study was considered valid if the mean colony counts of the control values of the strains were within acceptable ranges, if the results of the positive controls met the criteria for a positive response, and if no more than 5 % of the plates were lost through contamination or other unforseen events.
A test material was considered to be positive if the increase in the mean number of revertant colonies on the test plates was concentration-related or if a reproducible two-fold or more increase was observed compared to that of negative control plates.
A test material was considered to be negative in the bacterial gene mutation test if it produced neither a dose-related increase in the mean number of revertant colonies nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points. - Statistics:
- No statistical analysis was performed.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: The test material was found to precipitate at all concentrations.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: A dose range finding test was performed with TA 98 in both the absence and presence of S9-mix with ten different concentrations of the test material, ranging from 0.3-5000 µg/plate. The test material was not toxic at any concentration both in the absence and presence of S9-mix.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: A slightly more dense background lawn of the bacterial growth was observed at the dose levels at which the slight increases were observed; however, these occurred alongside precipitation of the test material. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 2: Results of Range Finding Test
Dose µg/plate |
TA 98 |
||
Without S9-mix |
With S9-mix |
||
0 |
38 |
52 |
|
36 |
46 |
||
29 |
48 |
||
Mean |
34 |
49 |
|
SD |
5 |
3 |
|
0.3 |
46 |
57 |
|
48 |
61 |
||
40 |
46 |
||
Mean |
45 |
55 |
|
SD |
4 |
8 |
|
0.8 |
46 |
69 |
|
44 |
57 |
||
26 |
60 |
||
Mean |
39 |
62 |
|
SD |
11 |
6 |
|
2.3 |
52 |
52 |
|
42 |
55 |
||
34 |
57 |
||
Mean |
43 |
55 |
|
SD |
9 |
3 |
|
7 |
27 |
59 |
|
42 |
59 |
||
46 |
60 |
||
Mean |
38 |
59 |
|
SD |
10 |
1 |
|
21 |
31 |
53 |
|
27 |
42 |
||
36 |
47 |
||
Mean |
31 |
47 |
|
SD |
5 |
6 |
|
62 |
42 |
56 |
|
33 |
47 |
||
40 |
60 |
||
Mean |
38 |
54 |
|
SD |
5 |
7 |
|
185 |
45 |
58 |
|
36 |
63 |
||
39 |
46 |
||
Mean |
40 |
56 |
|
SD |
5 |
9 |
|
556 |
34 |
38 |
|
39 |
45 |
||
35 |
40 |
||
Mean |
36 |
41 |
|
SD |
3 |
4 |
|
1667 |
45 |
59 |
|
44 |
57 |
||
39 |
68 |
||
Mean |
43 |
61 |
|
SD |
3 |
6 |
|
5000 |
37 |
57 |
|
41 |
52 |
||
38 |
50 |
||
Mean |
39 |
53 |
|
SD |
2 |
4 |
|
Positive control |
1170 |
1090 |
|
1225 |
1051 |
||
1201 |
1074 |
||
Mean |
1199 |
1072 |
|
SD |
28 |
20 |
*The positive controls employed are detail in table 1.
Table 3: Results of the Definitive Test
Dose µg/plate |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
E. coli |
||||||
Without S9-mix |
With S9-mix |
Without S9-mix |
With S9-mix |
Without S9-mix |
With S9-mix |
Without S9-mix |
With S9-mix |
Without S9-mix |
With S9-mix |
||
0 |
15 |
17 |
8 |
22 |
29 |
77 |
165 |
156 |
** |
31 |
|
21 |
28 |
13 |
6 |
32 |
51 |
186 |
189 |
23 |
26 |
||
16 |
15 |
13 |
15 |
27 |
36 |
163 |
175 |
37 |
25 |
||
Mean |
17 |
20 |
11 |
14 |
29 |
55 |
171 |
173 |
30 |
27 |
|
SD |
3 |
7 |
3 |
8 |
3 |
21 |
13 |
17 |
10 |
3 |
|
62 |
15 |
20 |
5 |
15 |
16 |
60 |
151 |
170 |
40 |
46 |
|
18 |
24 |
15 |
14 |
27 |
40 |
148 |
166 |
46 |
39 |
||
20 |
22 |
12 |
8 |
24 |
51 |
173 |
198 |
40 |
42 |
||
Mean |
18P |
22 |
11 |
12 |
22 |
50 |
153 |
178 |
42* |
42 |
|
SD |
3 |
2 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
10 |
14 |
17 |
3 |
4 |
|
185 |
8 |
23 |
11 |
16 |
25 |
57 |
159 |
181 |
35 |
41 |
|
23 |
24 |
6 |
4 |
28 |
55 |
149 |
161 |
36 |
34 |
||
20 |
13 |
4 |
9 |
28 |
56 |
211 |
182 |
31 |
47 |
||
Mean |
17P |
20 |
7 |
10 |
27 |
56 |
173 |
175 |
34* |
41 |
|
SD |
8 |
6 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
33 |
12 |
3 |
7 |
|
556 |
17 |
20 |
9 |
9 |
31 |
38 |
183 |
144 |
49 |
37 |
|
30 |
23 |
9 |
8 |
26 |
53 |
168 |
155 |
36 |
33 |
||
14 |
25 |
8 |
11 |
29 |
35 |
170 |
159 |
30 |
49 |
||
Mean |
20P |
23 |
9 |
9 |
29 |
42 |
174 |
153 |
38* |
40 |
|
SD |
9 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
10 |
8 |
8 |
10 |
8 |
|
1667 |
20 |
11 |
5 |
6 |
48 |
31 |
146 |
162 |
33 |
50 |
|
28 |
20 |
18 |
8 |
35 |
37 |
146 |
152 |
41 |
38 |
||
22 |
31 |
18 |
12 |
36 |
85 |
150 |
170 |
67 |
27 |
||
Mean |
23P |
21 |
14 |
9 |
40 |
51 |
147 |
161 |
47* |
38 |
|
SD |
4 |
10 |
8 |
3 |
7 |
30 |
2 |
9 |
18 |
12 |
|
5000 |
31 |
20 |
8 |
11 |
31 |
40 |
153 |
166 |
46 |
49 |
|
34 |
19 |
7 |
14 |
51 |
42 |
137 |
161 |
46 |
39 |
||
30 |
28 |
11 |
15 |
26 |
48 |
131 |
161 |
42 |
41 |
||
Mean |
32* |
22 |
9 |
13 |
36 |
43 |
140 |
163 |
45* |
43 |
|
SD |
2 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
13 |
4 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
|
Positive control |
442 |
365 |
1053 |
211 |
1105 |
634 |
744 |
1245 |
287 |
698 |
|
444 |
345 |
863 |
212 |
1185 |
738 |
704 |
940 |
221 |
677 |
||
427 |
374 |
913 |
216 |
1186 |
555 |
708 |
1012 |
242 |
715 |
||
Mean |
438 |
361 |
943 |
213 |
1159 |
642 |
719 |
1066 |
250 |
697 |
|
SD |
9 |
15 |
98 |
3 |
46 |
92 |
22 |
159 |
34 |
19 |
|
P: Precipitation of test material. * : Precipitation of test substance and slightly more dense background lawn of bacterial growth than in concomitant control plates. **: Not counted; no bacteria on the agar plate. |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Under the conditions of the test, the test material was found to be non-mutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 and in the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA, either in the absence or presence of metabolic activation (S9-mix). - Executive summary:
The mutagenicity of the test material was assessed in a bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test) in accordance with standardised guidelines OECD 471 and EPA OPPTS 870.5100. The cultures were exposed to 0, 62, 185, 556, 1667 and 5000 µg/plate. Precipitation of the test material was observed at a number of the concentrations tested. In some of the plates slight dose-dependent increases in the number of revertants were noticed, however this was accompanied by an increased background lawn and precipitation. This was therefore not attributed to the mutagenic potential of the test material. Under the conditions of the test, the test material was found to be non-mutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 and in the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA, either in the absence or presence of metabolic activation (S9-mix).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.