Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Vapour pressure

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Due to insufficient reporting of the experimental details, this study was rated with a Klimisch score of 4 (‘not assignable’). As none of the available studies can serve as a key study with a sufficiently detailed reporting justifying a Klimisch score of 1 or 2 for the given endpoint, several independent sources were used in a weight of evidence approach. The combined data from handbooks or collection of data provide experimental values in a similar range, supporting the reliability of the result.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
secondary peer reviewed source, valid collection of data
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: no data
Specific details on test material used for the study:
analytical purity: not specified
Temp.:
20 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.26 hPa
Executive summary:

ROEMPP Online, 2009


The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 26 Pa at 20°C.

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Due to insufficient reporting of the experimental details, this study was rated with a Klimisch score of 4 (‘not assignable’). As none of the available studies can serve as a key study with a sufficiently detailed reporting justifying a Klimisch score of 1 or 2 for the given endpoint, several independent sources were used in a weight of evidence approach. The combined data from handbooks or collection of data provide experimental values in a similar range, supporting the reliability of the result.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
secondary peer reviewed source, valid collection of data
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: no data
Specific details on test material used for the study:
analytical purity: not specified
Temp.:
38.4 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.13 kPa
Temp.:
67.3 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.67 kPa
Temp.:
81.7 °C
Vapour pressure:
1.33 kPa
Temp.:
97.2 °C
Vapour pressure:
2.67 kPa
Temp.:
114.8 °C
Vapour pressure:
5.33 kPa
Temp.:
125.7 °C
Vapour pressure:
8 kPa
Temp.:
140 °C
Vapour pressure:
13.3 kPa
Temp.:
162 °C
Vapour pressure:
26.7 kPa
Temp.:
187.7 °C
Vapour pressure:
53.3 kPa
Temp.:
213.5 °C
Vapour pressure:
101.3 kPa
Executive summary:

Ullmann, 2006


Data of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene on vapour pressure range from 130 Pa at 38.4 °C and 101,300 Pa at 213.5 °C.

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Remarks:
Only secondary literature
Justification for type of information:
Due to insufficient reporting of the experimental details, this study was rated with a Klimisch score of 4 (‘not assignable’). As none of the available studies can serve as a key study with a sufficiently detailed reporting justifying a Klimisch score of 1 or 2 for the given endpoint, several independent sources were used in a weight of evidence approach. The combined data from handbooks or collection of data provide experimental values in a similar range, supporting the reliability of the result.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
secondary peer reviewed scoure, valid collection af data
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: no data
Specific details on test material used for the study:
analytical purity: not specified
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.46 mm Hg

Conversion from mm Hg to Pa: 1 mm Hg = 133 Pa

Executive summary:

Shiu, 1997


The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 61 Pa at 25°C.

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Due to insufficient reporting of the experimental details, this study was rated with a Klimisch score of 4 (‘not assignable’). As none of the available studies can serve as a key study with a sufficiently detailed reporting justifying a Klimisch score of 1 or 2 for the given endpoint, several independent sources were used in a weight of evidence approach. The combined data from handbooks or collection of data provide experimental values in a similar range, supporting the reliability of the result.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
secondary peer reviewed scoure, valid collection af data
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: no data
Specific details on test material used for the study:
analytical purity: not specified
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.453 hPa
Executive summary:

WHO, 1991


The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 45.3 Pa at 25°C.

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Remarks:
Original report not available
Justification for type of information:
Due to insufficient reporting of the experimental details, this study was rated with a Klimisch score of 4 (‘not assignable’). As none of the available studies can serve as a key study with a sufficiently detailed reporting justifying a Klimisch score of 1 or 2 for the given endpoint, several independent sources were used in a weight of evidence approach. The combined data from handbooks or collection of data provide experimental values in a similar range, supporting the reliability of the result.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
secondary peer reviewed scoure, valid collection af data
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: no data
Specific details on test material used for the study:
analytical purity: not specified
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.38 hPa
Executive summary:

Rippen, 1991, EPA, 1985, UBA, 1984, Ware 1977


The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 38 Pa at 25°C.

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Remarks:
Only secondary literature
Justification for type of information:
Due to insufficient reporting of the experimental details, this study was rated with a Klimisch score of 4 (‘not assignable’). As none of the available studies can serve as a key study with a sufficiently detailed reporting justifying a Klimisch score of 1 or 2 for the given endpoint, several independent sources were used in a weight of evidence approach. The combined data from handbooks or collection of data provide experimental values in a similar range, supporting the reliability of the result.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
secondary peer reviewed scoure, valid collection af data
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: no data
Specific details on test material used for the study:
analytical purity: not specified
Temp.:
20 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.31 hPa
Executive summary:

Rippen, 1991


The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 31 Pa at 20°C.

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Due to insufficient reporting of the experimental details, this study was rated with a Klimisch score of 4 (‘not assignable’). As none of the available studies can serve as a key study with a sufficiently detailed reporting justifying a Klimisch score of 1 or 2 for the given endpoint, several independent sources were used in a weight of evidence approach. The combined data from handbooks or collection of data provide experimental values in a similar range, supporting the reliability of the result.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
secondary peer reviewed scoure, valid collection af data
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: no data
Specific details on test material used for the study:
analytical purity: not specified
Temp.:
38.4 °C
Vapour pressure:
1.3 hPa
Executive summary:

Howard, 1989, UBA 1984


The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 130 Pa at 38.4 °C.

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Due to insufficient reporting of the experimental details, this study was rated with a Klimisch score of 4 (‘not assignable’). As none of the available studies can serve as a key study with a sufficiently detailed reporting justifying a Klimisch score of 1 or 2 for the given endpoint, several independent sources were used in a weight of evidence approach. The combined data from handbooks or collection of data provide experimental values in a similar range, supporting the reliability of the result.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
secondary peer reviewed scoure, valid collection af data
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: no data
Specific details on test material used for the study:
analytical purity: not specified
Temp.:
50 °C
Vapour pressure:
2.02 hPa
Executive summary:

Auer, 1988


The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 202 Pa at 50°C.

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Due to insufficient reporting of the experimental details, this study was rated with a Klimisch score of 4 (‘not assignable’). As none of the available studies can serve as a key study with a sufficiently detailed reporting justifying a Klimisch score of 1 or 2 for the given endpoint, several independent sources were used in a weight of evidence approach. The combined data from handbooks or collection of data provide experimental values in a similar range, supporting the reliability of the result.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
secondary peer reviewed source, valid collection af data
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: no data
Specific details on test material used for the study:
analytical purity: not specified
Temp.:
20 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.26 hPa
Executive summary:

Auer, 1988, Hommel, 1994


The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 26 Pa at 20°C.

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Due to insufficient reporting of the experimental details, this study was rated with a Klimisch score of 4 (‘not assignable’). As none of the available studies can serve as a key study with a sufficiently detailed reporting justifying a Klimisch score of 1 or 2 for the given endpoint, several independent sources were used in a weight of evidence approach. The combined data from handbooks or collection of data provide experimental values in a similar range, supporting the reliability of the result.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
secondary peer reviewed scoure, valid collection af data
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: no data
Specific details on test material used for the study:
analytical purity: not specified
Temp.:
30 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.54 hPa
Executive summary:

Auer, 1988


The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 54 Pa at 30°C.

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Due to insufficient reporting of the experimental details, this study was rated with a Klimisch score of 4 (‘not assignable’). As none of the available studies can serve as a key study with a sufficiently detailed reporting justifying a Klimisch score of 1 or 2 for the given endpoint, several independent sources were used in a weight of evidence approach. The combined data from handbooks or collection of data provide experimental values in a similar range, supporting the reliability of the result.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
secondary peer reviewed scoure, valid collection af data
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: no data
Specific details on test material used for the study:
analytical purity: not specified
Temp.:
20 °C
Vapour pressure:
26.3 Pa
Executive summary:

Korte, 1986


The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 26.3 Pa at 20°C.

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Original report not available
Justification for type of information:
Due to insufficient reporting of the experimental details, this study was rated with a Klimisch score of 4 (‘not assignable’). As none of the available studies can serve as a key study with a sufficiently detailed reporting justifying a Klimisch score of 1 or 2 for the given endpoint, several independent sources were used in a weight of evidence approach. The combined data from handbooks or collection of data provide experimental values in a similar range, supporting the reliability of the result.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
secondary peer reviewed scoure, valid collection af data
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: no data
Specific details on test material used for the study:
analytical purity: not specified
Temp.:
25 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.56 hPa
Executive summary:

Hooftman, 1982


The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 56 Pa at 25°C.

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Due to insufficient reporting of the experimental details, this study was rated with a Klimisch score of 4 (‘not assignable’). As none of the available studies can serve as a key study with a sufficiently detailed reporting justifying a Klimisch score of 1 or 2 for the given endpoint, several independent sources were used in a weight of evidence approach. The combined data from handbooks or collection of data provide experimental values in a similar range, supporting the reliability of the result.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
secondary peer reviewed scoure, valid collection af data
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: no data
Specific details on test material used for the study:
analytical purity: not specified
Temp.:
20 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.32 hPa
Executive summary:

GSF, 1982


The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 32 Pa at 20°C.

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Due to insufficient reporting of the experimental details, this study was rated with a Klimisch score of 4 (‘not assignable’). As none of the available studies can serve as a key study with a sufficiently detailed reporting justifying a Klimisch score of 1 or 2 for the given endpoint, several independent sources were used in a weight of evidence approach. The combined data from handbooks or collection of data provide experimental values in a similar range, supporting the reliability of the result.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
secondary peer reviewed scoure, valid collection af data
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: no data
Specific details on test material used for the study:
analytical purity: not specified
Temp.:
20 °C
Vapour pressure:
0.4 hPa
Executive summary:

Beilstein, 1978


The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 40 Pa at 20°C.

Description of key information

The individual study reports (data from handbooks or collection of data) show some deficiencies with respect to the comprehensiveness of the experimental details. Therefore, a reliability of 1 or 2 and thus adequacy as key study was not assignable for any of the individual studies. Consequently, the studies were assigned a Klimisch score of 4 (according to guidance document R.4, ‘not assignable: studies or data […] which are only listed in short abstracts or secondary literature (books, reviews, etc.)). As the individual studies report values are in a similar range, collectively, these studies can be used to conclude on this endpoint and to satisfy the information requirement.


 


The vapor pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was determined in a series of experimental studies and is 26 Pa to 61 Pa in the temperature range from 20 °C to 25 °C. The mean value of 43.5 Pa at room temperature was chosen as key value for chemical safety assessment.
Experiments at temperatures between 38.4 °C and 213.5 °C show vapor pressures between 130 Pa and 101300 Pa.


 


ROEMPP Online, 2009
The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 26 Pa at 20°C.



Ullmann, 2006
Data of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene on vapour pressure range from 130 Pa at 38.4 °C and 101,300 Pa at 213.5 °C.



Shiu, 1997
The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 61 Pa at 25°C.



WHO, 1991
The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 45.3 Pa at 25°C.



Rippen, 1991, EPA, 1985, UBA, 1984, Ware 1977
The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 38 Pa at 25°C.



Rippen, 1991
The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 31 Pa at 20°C.



Howard, 1989, UBA 1984
The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 130 Pa at 38.4 °C.



Auer, 1988
The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 202 Pa at 50°C.



Auer, 1988, Hommel, 1994
The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 26 Pa at 20°C.


 


Korte, 1986
The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 26.3 Pa at 20°C.



Hooftman, 1982
The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 56 Pa at 25°C.



GSF, 1982
The vapour pressure of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was reported as 32 Pa at 20°C.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Vapour pressure:
43.5 Pa
at the temperature of:
20 °C

Additional information