Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Hydrolysis

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
hydrolysis
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
31st Jan to 12th june 2007
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: - Study generated according to generally valid and/or internationally accepted testing guidelines - Performed according to GLP - Test parameters based on specific testing guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 111 (Hydrolysis as a Function of pH)
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 111, “Hydrolysis as a Function of pH; adopted April 13, 2004 (only at pH 4.0, pH 7.0 and pH 9.0).

EEC Directive 92/69, Section C.7, “Abiotic Degradation: Hydrolysis as a Function of pH”, L383 A, December 1992.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
None
Radiolabelling:
not specified
Analytical monitoring:
not specified
Details on sampling:
See below
Buffers:
Buffer pH 4, Biphthalate Baker Art. No. 5657
Buffer pH 7, Phosphate Baker Art. No. 5656
Buffer pH 9, Borate Baker Art. No. 7145
The buffer solutions were sterilized for 25 minutes in an autoclave prior to first use. Nitrogen was passed through the buffer solutions for 2 minutes except when freshly sterilized.
Details on test conditions:
According to the OECD guidelines. However due to the very low solubility of the FP-100 the test was not completed
Number of replicates:
N/A
Statistical methods:
see report
Preliminary study:
See report
Test performance:
The solubility of FP-100 in the buffer solutions pH 4.0, pH 7.0 and pH 9.0 was very low. It was not possible to increase the solubihty of the test item with the use of different solubilizers (acetonitrile, dimethylsulfoxide and tetrahydrofuran). Peaks obtained, if any, were too small to allow quantification or even to follow a degradation curve.

According to the EEC Directive 92/69, Section C.7, the method is applicable only to water soluble substances. The test item shows no significant solubility in the different solvent systems. Therefore, no further testing could be performed with FP-100 at pH 4.0, pH 7.0 and pH 9.0.

The r2 fit was 0.9999 (optimum = 1.0000). This reflects the linearity of the HPLC-system within the calibration range of 0.948 µg/mI to 113.76 µg/mI of the test item.
Transformation products:
not measured
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Other kinetic parameters:
N/A
Details on results:
N/A
Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Remarks:
Solubility too low for test to be completed
Conclusions:
Hydrolysis of FP-100 could not be determined due to its poor water solubility

Description of key information

FP-100 is poorly water soluble and its hydrolysis could not be determined

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Half-life for hydrolysis:
1 yr
at the temperature of:
20 °C

Additional information

Hydrolysis of FP-100 could not be determined due to its poor water solubility