Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-476-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The test substance was corrosive to rabbit skin after a 4 hour occluded exposure. The BCOP showed a score below 55 which does not indicate a category 1 classification. However the BCOP test can under predict eye damage for diamine chemistry.An in-vivo rabbit eye study was not possible due to animal welfare concerns as the test substance was corrosive to skin category 1C.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Experimental start date 14 March 2017 Experimental completion date 28 March 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2500 (Acute Dermal Irritation)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: • Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (JMAFF), Testing Guidelines for Toxicology Studies, 12 NohSan No. 8147, amended 10 December 2002
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Identification: Diamine-Fatty Acids mixture salt
Batch: HJ16-040
Purity: 99.6%
Physical state / Appearance: brown paste
Expiry date: 07 July 2017
Storage conditions: room temperature in the dark - Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- One New Zealand White (Hsdlf:NZW) strain rabbit was supplied by Envigo RMS (UK) Limited, Leicestershire, UK. At the start of the study the animal weighed 3.23 kg and was 12 to 52 weeks old. After an acclimatization period of at least 5 days the animal was given a number unique within the study which was written with a black indelible marker pen on the inner surface of the ear and on the cage label.
Animal Care and Husbandry
The animal was housed in a suspended cage. Free access to mains drinking water and food (2930C Teklad Global Rabbit diet supplied by Envigo RMS (UK) Limited, Oxon, UK) was allowed throughout the study. The diet and drinking water were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.
The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 17 to 23 °C and 30 to 70% respectively. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give 12 hours continuous light and 12 hours darkness.
The animal was provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study. - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Amount / concentration applied:
- On the day before the test the rabbit was clipped free of fur from the dorsal/flank area using veterinary clippers.
Three suitable sites were selected on the back of the rabbit. A quantity of 0.5 mL of the test item was applied directly to the skin under a 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm cotton gauze patch. Each patch was secured in position with a strip of surgical adhesive tape. To prevent the animal interfering with the patches, the trunk of the rabbit was wrapped in an elasticated corset for the duration of the exposure period. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- One patch was removed at each of three time points: 3 minutes, 1 hour and 4 hours after application. Any residual test item was removed by gentle swabbing with cotton wool soaked in 74% Industrial Methylated Spirits.
After consideration of the skin reactions produced in the first animal, no additional animals were treated. - Observation period:
- 14 days
- Number of animals:
- One
- Details on study design:
- One patch was removed at each of three time points: 3 minutes, 1 hour and 4 hours after application. Any residual test item was removed by gentle swabbing with cotton wool soaked in 74% Industrial Methylated Spirits.
If irreversible alteration of the dermal tissue is noted in any rabbit, as judged by the Study Director, which include ulceration and clear necrosis or signs of scar tissue, the test item is classified as corrosive to rabbit skin. Classification according to Draize may, therefore, not be applicable.
The results were also evaluated according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, relating to the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures and the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- 3-Minute Exposure Period
Well-defined erythema and very slight edema were noted at the treated skin site at the 24 Hour observation with well defined erythema and slight edema noted at the 48 Hour observation and well defined erythema and very slight edema noted at the 72 Hour observation. Slight desquamation was noted at the treated skin site at the 7 Day observation.
The treated skin site appeared normal at the 14-Day observation.
1-Hour Exposure Period
Very slight erythema and very slight edema were noted at the treated skin site immediately and 1 hour after treatment. Well defined erythema and slight edema were noted at the treated skin site at the 24 Hour observation with well defined erythema and very slight edema noted at the 48 and 72 Hour observations. The erythema and edema extended approximately 10 mm around the test site at the 24, 48 and 72 Hour observations.
Additional skin reactions noted at the treated skin site at the 24, 48 and 72 Hour observations were hemorrhage of the dermal capillaries, blanching of the skin, light brown discoloration of the epidermis and loss of skin elasticity and flexibility. A hardened dark brown/black colored scab, preventing accurate evaluation of erythema and edema, was noted at the treated skin site at the 7 Day observation. Small superficial scattered scabs and glossy skin were noted at the treated skin site at the 14 Day observation.
4-Hour Exposure Period
Very slight erythema and slight edema were noted at the treated skin site immediately after patch removal with well defined erythema and slight edema noted 1 hour after treatment. Well defined erythema and moderate edema were noted at the treated skin site at the 24 Hour observation with well defined erythema and slight edema noted at the 48 and 72 Hour observations. The erythema and edema extended approximately 10 mm around the test site at the 24 Hour observation.
Additional skin reactions noted at the treated skin site at the 24, 48 and 72 Hour observations were hemorrhage of the dermal capillaries, blanching of the skin, light brown discoloration of the epidermis and loss of skin elasticity and flexibility. A hardened dark brown/black colored scab, preventing accurate evaluation of erythema and edema, was noted at the treated skin site at the 7 Day observation. Small superficial scattered scabs, scar tissue and glossy skin were noted at the treated skin site at the 14 Day observation.
The skin reactions noted were considered to be irreversible and indicative of full thickness tissue destruction. - Other effects:
- The animal showed expected gain in body weight during the study.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1C (corrosive) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- The test item was classified as CORROSIVE to rabbit skin (based on one animal only).
The test item was also classified as Category 1C (Corrosive) according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals.
The test item was also classified as Corrosive (Category 1C) according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, relating to the Classification, Labeling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures. It is reasonable to assume that the signal word “Danger” and the Hazard Statement “H314: Causes severe skin burns and eye damage” are therefore required. - Executive summary:
Introduction
The study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test item following single, 3‑Minute, 1 and 4‑Hour, semi‑occluded applications to the intact rabbit skin.
Results
A single 3‑Minute semi-occluded application of the test item to the intact skin of one rabbit produced well-defined erythema, slight edema and slight desquamation. The treated skin site appeared normal at the 14‑Day observation.
A single 1‑Hour semi-occluded application of the test item to the intact skin of one rabbit produced well‑defined erythema, slight edema, hemorrhage of the dermal capillaries, blanching of the skin, light brown discoloration of the epidermis, loss of skin elasticity and flexibility, small superficial scattered scabs, a hardened dark brown/black colored scab (preventing evaluation of erythema and edema) and glossy skin. On occasions the erythematous and edematous reactions extended approximately 10 mm beyond the treatment site.
A single 4‑Hour, semi occluded application of the test item to the intact skin of one rabbit produced reactions indicative of dermal corrosion. The reactions included well‑defined erythema, moderate edema, hemorrhage of the dermal capillaries, blanching of the skin, light brown discoloration of the epidermis, loss of skin elasticity and flexibility, a hardened dark brown/black colored scab (preventing evaluation of erythema and edema), small superficial scattered scabs, scar tissue and glossy skin. On occasions the erythematous and edematous reactions extended approximately 10 mm beyond the treatment site.The skin reactions noted were considered to be irreversible and indicative of full thickness tissue destruction.
Conclusion
The test item was classified as CORROSIVE to rabbit skin (based on one animal only).
The test item was also classified as Category 1C (Corrosive) according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals.
The test item was also classified as Corrosive (Category 1C) according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, relating to the Classification, Labeling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures. It is reasonable to assume that the signal word “Danger” and the Hazard Statement “H314: Causes severe skin burns and eye damage” are therefore required.
Reference
Individual Skin Reactions Following 3-Minute and 1-Hour Exposures
Skin Reaction |
Observation Time |
Individual Scores |
|
Rabbit Number and Sex |
|||
75729Female |
|||
3-Minute Exposure |
1-Hour Exposure |
||
Erythema/Eschar Formation |
Immediately |
0 |
1 |
1 Hour |
0 |
1 |
|
24 Hours |
2 |
2RHdBlLeLfBr |
|
48 Hours |
2 |
2RHdBlLeLfBr |
|
72 Hours |
2 |
2RHdBlLeLfBr |
|
7 Days |
0D |
?eSt |
|
14 Days |
0 |
0SsG |
|
Edema Formation |
Immediately |
0 |
1 |
1 Hour |
0 |
1 |
|
24 Hours |
1 |
2 |
|
48 Hours |
2 |
1 |
|
72 Hours |
1 |
1 |
|
7 Days |
0 |
?od |
|
14 Days |
0 |
0 |
Individual Skin Reactions Following 4-Hour Exposure
Skin Reaction |
Observation Time |
Individual Scores |
Rabbit Number and Sex |
||
75729Female |
||
Erythema/ |
Immediately |
1 |
1 Hour |
2 |
|
24 Hours |
2RHdBlLeLfBr |
|
48 Hours |
2HdBlLeLfBr |
|
72 Hours |
2HdBlLeLfBr |
|
7 Days |
?eSt |
|
14 Days |
0SsScG |
|
Edema Formation |
Immediately |
2 |
1 Hour |
2 |
|
24 Hours |
3 |
|
48 Hours |
2 |
|
72 Hours |
2 |
|
7 Days |
?od |
|
14 Days |
0 |
|
Classification : CORROSIVE |
Individual body Weights and Body Weight Change
Rabbit Number |
Individual Body Weight (kg) |
Body Weight Change (kg) |
|
Day 0 |
Day 14 |
||
75729Female |
3.23 |
3.51 |
0.28 |
Bl = Blanching of the skin
Br = Light brown discoloration of the epidermis
D= Slight desquamation
G = Glossy skin
Hd = Hemorrhage of dermal capillaries
Le = Loss of skin elasticity
Lf = Loss of skin flexibility
R = Erythema and edema extended approximately 10 mm around the test site
Ss = Small superficial scattered scabs
St = Hardened dark brown/black colored scab
?e = Adverse skin reaction prevented accurate evaluation of erythema
?od = Adverse skin reaction prevented accurate evaluation of edema
Bl = Blanching of the skin
Br = Light brown discoloration of the epidermis
G = Glossy skin
Hd = Hemorrhage of dermal capillaries
Le = Loss of skin elasticity
Lf = Loss of skin flexibility
R = Erythema and edema extended approximately 10 mm around the test site
Sc = Scar tissue
Ss = Small superficial scattered scabs
St = Hardened dark brown/black colored scab
?e = Adverse skin reaction prevented accurate evaluation of erythema
?od = Adverse skin reaction prevented accurate evaluation of edema
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (corrosive)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The test was performed on 04 November 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted to GLP and in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do no effect the quality of the relevant results.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Date of inspection: 25 April 2012, 23 ,25,Date of inspection: 13-16 July 2015, Date of Signature: 14 September 2015
- Species:
- other: Freshly isolated bovine cornea (at least 9 month old donor cattle)
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Source: Schlachthof Aschaffenburg, 63739 Aschaffenburg, Germany
- Vehicle:
- physiological saline
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.75 mL of 20% (w/v) suspension of the test item in saline was prepared using ultrasonic technique (5 minutes).
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 240 minutes
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- The incubation period was 240 minutes.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 corneae per group (test item, negative control, positive control)
- Details on study design:
- Three corneas were exposed to each 0.75 mL of the test item, the negative, and the positive control for 10 minutes.
SCORING SYSTEM:
Opacity Measurement:
The opacitometer determines changes in the light transmission passing through the corneae, and displays a numerical opacity value. The opacitometer OP_KiT opacitometer (Electro Design, 63-Riom France) was calibrated as described in the manual and the opacity of each of the corneae was determined by reading each holder placed in the photoreceptor compartment for treated cornea.
After exposure of the corneae to the test groups and after rinsing, the opacity value was determined again (t240).
Permeability Determination:
Following to the opacity readings, the permeability was measured as an indication of the integrity of the epithelial cell sheets. After the final opacity measurement was performed, the incubation medium was removed from the anterior compartment and replaced by 1 mL of a 0.5% (w/v) sodium fluorescein solution in HBSS. Corneae were incubated again in a horizontal position for 90 ± 10 minutes in a water-bath at 32 ± 1 °C. Incubation medium from the posterior compartment were removed, well mixed and transferred into a 96 well plate and the optical density at 490 nm (OD490) was determined with a spectrophotometer.
The optical density was measured with a microplate reader (Versamax® Molecular Devices) at 490 nm (OD490). The absorbance values were determined using the software SoftMax Pro Enterprise (version 4.7.1).
Data Evaluation
Opacity:
The change of opacity value of each treated cornea or positive and negative control corneae is calculated by subtracting the initial basal opacity from the post treatment opacity reading (t240 – t0), for each individual cornea.
The average change in opacity of the negative control corneae is calculated and this value is subtracted from the change in opacity of each treated cornea or positive control to obtain a corrected opacity.
Permeability:
The corrected OD490 value of each cornea treated with positive control and test item is calculated by subtracting the average negative control cornea value from the original permeability value for each cornea.
IVIS Calculation:
The following formula is used to determine the IVIS of the negative control:
IVIS = opacity value + (15 x OD490 value)
The following formula is used to determine the IVIS of the positive control and the test item:
IVIS = (opacity value – opacity value mean negative control) + (15 x corrected OD490 value)
The mean IVIS value of each treated group is calculated from the IVIS values
.
Depending on the score obtained, the test item is classified in the following category according to OECD guideline 437:
IVIS: In vitro Irritancy Score (according to OECD 437):
≤ 3 No Category (according to GHS)
> 3; ≤ 55 No prediction can be made
> 55 CSerious eye damage according to CLP/EPA/GHS (category 1)
Criteria for Determination of a Valid Test:
The test will be acceptable if
• the positive control gives an IVIS that falls within two standard deviations of the current historical mean (updated every three months), and if
• the negative control responses result in opacity and permeability values that are less than the established upper limits for background opacity and permeability values for bovine corneae treated with the respective negative control. - Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- Mean of three cornea
- Value:
- 40.21
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: No prediction can be made
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes - Interpretation of results:
- other: Diamine-Fatty Acids mixture salt is not serious eye damaging (CLP/EPA/GHS (Cat 1) but a prediction for the damage hazard cannot be made (GHS).
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, according to the current study and under the experimental conditions reported, Diamine-Fatty Acids mixture salt is not serious eye damaging (CLP/EPA/GHS (Cat 1) but a prediction for the damage hazard cannot be made (GHS).
- Executive summary:
This in vitro study was performed to assess thecorneal damage potentialofDiamine-Fatty Acids mixture salt by means of the BCOP assay usingfresh bovine corneae.
After a first opacity measurement of the fresh bovine corneae (t0), the 20% (w/v)suspensionin saline (0.9% (w/v) NaCl in deionised water) of the test item Diamine-Fatty Acids mixture salt, the positive, and the negative controls were applied to corneae fixed in an incubation chamber in horizontal position and incubated for 240 minutes at 32 ± 1 °C. The posterior chamber containedincubation medium. After the incubation phase the test item, the positive, and the negative controls were each rinsed from the corneae andopacity was measured again (t240).
After the opacity measurements permeability of the corneae was determined by measuring spectrophotometrically the transfer of sodium fluorescein after incubation in a horizontal position for 90 minutes at 32 ± 1 °C.
With the negative control (physiological saline) neither an increase of opacity nor permeability of the corneae could be observed.
The positive control (10% (w/v) Benzalkonium chloride in saline) showed clear opacity and distinctive permeability of the corneae corresponding to a classification as serious eye damage (CLP/EPA/GHS (Cat 1)).
Relative to the negative control, the test item Diamine-Fatty Acids mixture salt caused an increase of the corneal opacity and permeability compared with the values caused by the negative control. The calculated meanin vitroirritancy score was 40.21.According to OECD 437 the test item is not classified as serious eye damaging (CLP/EPA/GHS (Cat 1), but the test item’s hazard for eye damaging cannot be predicted.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- the study need not be conducted because the available information indicates that the criteria are met for classification as corrosive to the skin or irritating to eyes
Referenceopen allclose all
Results after 240 Minutes Incubation Time
Test Group | Opacity value = Difference (t240-t0) of Opacity | Permeability at 490 nm (OD490) | IVIS | Mean IVIS | Proposed in vitro Irritancy Score | ||
Mean | Mean | ||||||
0 | 0.087 | 1.31 | |||||
Negative Control | 1 | 0.33 | 0.077 | 0.083 | 2.16 | 1.58 | Not categorized |
0 | 0.085 | 1.28 | |||||
112.67* | 0.105* | 114.24 | |||||
Positive Control | 113.67* | 0.184* | 116.43 | 113.77 | Category 1 | ||
107.67* | 0.199* | 110.65 | |||||
21.67* | 0.975* | 36.29 | |||||
Diamine-Fatty Acids mixture salt | 14.67* | 1.900* | 43.17 | 40.21 | No prediction | ||
11.67* | 1.966* | 41.16 |
*corrected values
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
The test substance was corrosive to rabbit skin after 4 hour exposure. Based on this it is classified as category 1C for corrosion to skin. The BCOP eye irritation study showed a score of 40.2 which is quite a high score but less than the 55 threshold for category 1 but well above the cut off for no classification of 3. With this result an in-vivo rabbit eye irritation test is required to confirm the classification, however with the classification as corrosive to skin it is not ethically acceptable to test the test substance in rabbit eyes. It is therefore concluded that the test substance in category 1 for damage to eyes.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
Tato webová stránka používá cookies, aby se vám naše stránky používaly co nejlépe.