Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 267-956-0 | CAS number: 67953-76-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water and sediment: simulation tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: simulation testing on ultimate degradation in surface water
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Justification for type of information:
- Please refer to Annex 3 of the CSR and IUCLID Section 13 for justification of read-across between members of the HEDP category.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- % Degr.:
- 5 - 10
- Parameter:
- radiochem. meas.
- Sampling time:
- 42 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Saeger 1979
- Remarks:
- natural water-sediment microcosms
- % Degr.:
- 1.2
- Parameter:
- radiochem. meas.
- Remarks:
- 14CO2 evolution
- Sampling time:
- 38 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Henkel 1979a
- Remarks:
- sewage treatment plant
- % Degr.:
- 0.3
- Parameter:
- radiochem. meas.
- Remarks:
- 14CO2 evolution
- Sampling time:
- 14 wk
- Remarks on result:
- other: Henkel 1979b
- Remarks:
- sewage treatment plant
- % Degr.:
- 3.5
- Parameter:
- radiochem. meas.
- Remarks:
- 14CO2 evolution
- Sampling time:
- 70 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Henkel 1979c
- Remarks:
- surface water
- Transformation products:
- not specified
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: sewage treatment simulation testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was well documented and meets generally accepted scientific principles, but was not conducted in compliance with GLP.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method: other: Screening Test / radioactive substance
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- other: sewage treatment plant effluent/biological stage
- Initial conc.:
- 0.14 mg/L
- % Degr.:
- 1.2
- Parameter:
- radiochem. meas.
- Remarks:
- 14CO2 evolution
- Sampling time:
- 38 d
- Transformation products:
- not measured
- Conclusions:
- other: poorly biodegradable under pertaining test conditions
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: sewage treatment simulation testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was well documented and meets generally accepted scientific principles, but was not conducted in compliance with GLP.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- other: 14C-sewage treatment plant simulation test
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic (adaptation not specified)
- Initial conc.:
- 1.3 mg/L
- Based on:
- other: active substance
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- radiochem. meas.
- % Degr.:
- 0.3
- Parameter:
- radiochem. meas.
- Remarks:
- 14CO2 evolution
- Sampling time:
- 14 wk
- Transformation products:
- not measured
- Conclusions:
- poorly biodegradable under pertaining test conditions
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: simulation testing on ultimate degradation in surface water
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was well documented and meets generally accepted scientific principles, but was not conducted in compliance with GLP.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method: other: Screening Test / radioactive substance
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- other: adapted inoculum
- Initial conc.:
- 0.3 mg/L
- % Degr.:
- 3.5
- Parameter:
- radiochem. meas.
- Remarks:
- 14CO2 evolution
- Sampling time:
- 70 d
- Transformation products:
- not measured
- Conclusions:
- other: poorly biodegradable under pertaining test conditions
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: sediment simulation testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was well documented and meets generally accepted scientific principles, but was not conducted in compliance with GLP.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Natural water - sediment microcosms. C14 labelled.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- natural water / sediment: freshwater
- Details on study design:
- Microcosms simulating a natural water environment were constructed using 10-gallon aquaria and a core-chamber technique. In the early phase of this study, water and sediment were collected from the littoral region of a spring fed freshwater lake (Lake 34). The sediment was screened through a steel screen (0.5 in mesh) to remove large particulates. 8 litres sediment; 22 litres water. Microcosms were allowed to stabilise for periods ranging fom one month to four months, with gentle aeration and a 16/8 hr light/dark cycle. Microcosms were allowed to stabilize for periods ranging from one to four months with gentle aeration and a 16/8 hour light/dark cycle using 300ft-candle Daylight fluorescent lamps. The pHs of the Lake 34 aquaria were in the 8.4 to 8.6 range with a conductivity of 420 to 460 µmhos. Dissolved oxygen levels were in the 6.5 to 7.5 range before coring.
At the end of stabilization period, core chambers were created by inserting sterile glass cylinders (3.8 x 30 cm) through the water column and sediment onto silicone stoppers. Each chanber contained 150 -175 ml water and 20 - 60 g sediment (dwt). Gas manifolds supplied either CO2 -free air or oxygen-free nitrogen about 5cm above the sediment surface. Gas flow in the Lake 34 microcosms were regulated by means of aquarium vales. Exhaust gas was passed through a resin trap to remove volatilised organics and then through a CO2 scubbing system containing 10ml of 2-methoxyethanol : monoethanolamine solution (7:1, V:V). The maintenance of sterile conditions was monitored using a 1ml water column sample and Millipore Total-Count water tester. Core chambers were removed from the aquaria, water and sediment were separately autoclaved and recombined. One ml of sodium azide aqueous solution (20 mg/ml) was then added.
C14 labelled test substance was added to each core chamber as an aqueous solution to achieve the desired concentration and activity. For the lake 34 microcosms, 1000 ppb concentrations were used. Samples of the water column were removed at day 0 and periodically thereafter and analyzed for C14 activity.
Ethanolamine traps were replaced according to the same schedule and the scrubber solutions were assayed for radioactivity. Tenax traps were removed at the end of each study and eluted with two 10ml portions of acetone. Eluates were assayed for radioactivity.
At the conclusion of each test, core chambers were removed from the aquaria. Teh water column remaining was carefully removed from each chamber and its volume determined. The sediment cores were transferred to tared evaporating dishes and the wet weight determined. The sediments were then air-dried. After determining the dry weight of each sediment, portions were subjected to extractive procedures or burned in an oxidiser to determine C14 activity.
15g dried sediment were extracted successively with 75ml and 50ml aliquots of of acidified acetone (5ml concentrated HCl per liter of acetone) using a homogenizer. Combined extracts were dried by passage through sodium chloride and anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated to 5ml in an evaporative concentrator. Portions of the extracts were then burned in an oxidiser to determine radioactivity.
C14 radioactivity analyses were carried out by liquid scintillation counting. Each sample was counted for three ten-minute cycles with a Liquid scintillation spectrometer using the preset isotope quench corrected program. C14 counting efficiencies were determined via the external standard pulse method using a certified set of 8 sealed quench standards. Correction for reagents of control blanks were made for all test samples.
For the water-column samples single one ml samples were added to 15ml of Packard insta-gel scintillation cocktail. 10ml of insta-gel was added to each ethanolamine scrubber prior to counting.
Sediment sampels were burned before and after extraction with an oxidiser. Triplicate 0.1g samples of each sediment were burned. The oxidiser samples were then counted in the manner previously described.
Acetone extracts of the sediments, because of their high quenching characteristics were assayed by burning 0.2ml of a 10:1 dilution of the concentrated extract.
Each aquaria had two controls with no test substance to monitor C14 activity. Single or duplicate cores were set up to monitor non-biological losses. - Key result
- % Degr.:
- 5 - 10
- Parameter:
- radiochem. meas.
- Sampling time:
- 42 d
- Transformation products:
- no
- Conclusions:
- A degradation rate in a water-sediment microcosm of 5 - 10 % after 42 days (3 - 5% under anaerobic conditions) was determined in a reliable study conducted according to generally accepted scientific principles.
Referenceopen allclose all
The registrants consider that the possible benefits to the CSA of conducting further studies of the formation of degradation products are not significant in comparison with the foreseeable difficulties to conduct and interpret the study.
Isolating and identifying degradation products presents a significant analytical challenge. There is substantial evidence across most types of phosphonates of rapid and irreversible binding to solids, particularly inorganic substrates (please refer to Section 4.2.1 of the Category CSR). It is difficult to envisage an analytical system suitable for extracting and analysing the substances which could not be affected by this. Secondly, the relevance of the data must be considered. This CSR discusses the environmental fate of HEDP and other analogous phosphonates. Whilst there is limited degradation in the environment, it is not extensive or rapid under standard conditions. Removal processes from natural waters are attributed to the typically rapid, irreversible adsorption to solid matrices. As such the chemical safety assessment for the environment focuses on the parent substance. There are no unacceptable risks (please refer to CSR Chapter 10). The substance is not classified for environmental hazard, and is not PBT or vPvB. The organophosphonate impurities are predicted to have the same properties as HEDP and not be of higher toxicity. Inorganic impurities present are not biodegradable.
Nicht signifikant abbaubar
Nicht signifikant abbaubar |
>90% decrease in water column C14 activity after 10d. >97% decrease was observed after 42 days (with the exception of 74% in the sterile, nitrogen purge, light condition). Microcosm variables: aeration vs nitrogen purge; light vs dark; active vs sterile, did not seem to significantly affect the rate of removal from the water column. This is indicative that a non-degradative mechanism dominates removal from water column. Autoclaving sodium azide treatment was not adequate for sterilisation.
In active, aerated systems, CO2 evolution ranged from 5 to 10%. In active nitrogen purged system, the CO2 evolution ranged from 3 to 5%. In sediment, C14 activity was not extracted to any significant degree with acidified acetone (unextracted and extracted had similar % of theory, and extract had low %). The percentage of C14 activity extracted varied from 0.5% to 2.2%. No significant C14 activity was found in the eluate from the Tenax resin traps, indicating that volatilised organics were not significant. The distribution of C14 activity after a 42 day study clearly demonstrated the majority of the C-14 activity was in the sediment, not in the water column.
Description of key information
A number of simulation studies are available for HEDP-H and its salts and provide a consistent weight of evidence for a lack of significant biodegradation under STP and aquatic simulation conditions in the absence of other factors.
Although biodegradation in sediment has not been demonstrated for HEDP-H and its salts, the role of abiotic removal processes is significant. The key data for sediment adsorption are from the study with HEDP-H by Michael (1979) (refer to Section 5.4.1 for further information about this test). There is no evidence for desorption occurring in this sediment adsorption study. Effectively irreversible binding is entirely consistent with the known behaviour of complexation and binding within crystal lattices. The high levels of adsorption which occur are therefore a form of removal from the environment. In river and lake water microcosms, after approximately 40-50 days, the phosphonate is >95% bound to sediment with only 5% extractable by ultrasonication and use of 0.25N HCl-xylene solvent (based on radiolabelling) (Saeger, 1979; cited by Gledhill and Feijtel, 1992). 66-80% removal (binding) is seen after 11 days in the same test. In the context of the exposure assessment, largely irreversible binding is interpreted as a removal process; 5% remaining after 40 - 50 days is equivalent to a half-life of 10 days which is significant for the environmental exposure assessment on the regional and continental scales. Thisabioticremoval rate is used for freshwater/marine water and freshwater/marine sediment half-lives in the chemical safety assessment of HEDP-H and its salts.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Half-life in freshwater:
- 10 d
- at the temperature of:
- 12 °C
- Half-life in marine water:
- 10 d
- at the temperature of:
- 12 °C
- Half-life in freshwater sediment:
- 10 d
- at the temperature of:
- 12 °C
- Half-life in marine water sediment:
- 10 d
- at the temperature of:
- 12 °C
Additional information
- HEDP is present as HEDP-H or one of its ionised forms. The degree of ionisation depends upon the pH of the system and not whether HEDP (1-2Na), HEDP (2-3Na), HEDP-4Na, HEDP-xK salts, HEDP-H or another salt was added.
- Disassociated sodium/potassium cations. The amount of sodium/potassium present depends on which salt was added.
- Divalent and trivalent cations have much higher stability constants for binding with HEDP than the sodium or potassium ions, so would preferentially replace them. These ions include calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+) and iron (Fe3+). Therefore, the presence of these in the environment or in biological fluids or from dietary sources would result in the formation of HEDP-dication (e.g. HEDP-Ca, HEDP-Mg) and HEDP-trication (e.g. HEDP-Fe) complexes in solution, irrespective of the starting substance/test material.
Three weight-of-evidence studies for HEDP (2-3Na) indicate a low amount of biodegradation in sewage treatment simulation and water studies: 1.2%, 0.3% and 3.5% biodegradation was observed in 38-day, 14-week and 70-day sampling times, respectively, based on radiochemical measurements/14CO2 evolution (Henkel, 1979a-c). These studies were well documented, met the generally accepted scientific principles, but were not conducted in compliance with GLP. Therefore, these studies were assigned reliability ratings of 2. Another weight-of-evidence study (reliability 2) indicated 5 -10% degradation of HEDP-H in natural water-sediment microcosms after 42 days, based on C14 radioactivity analysis via liquid scintillation counting (Saeger, 1979).
Additionally, <1% degradation was reported after 91 days of continuous administration of 14C-labelled HEDP (2-3Na) with synthetic sewage in a sewage treatment plant simulation study, under aerobic conditions (Steber and Wierich, 1986a and b). However, the documentation of the study was insufficient for assessment and it was assigned a reliability rating of 4. Another reliability 4 study indicated 50% degradation of HEDP-H based on DOC in a sewage treatment plant simulation study (Schoberl and Huber, 1988).
The acid, sodium and potassium salts in the HEDP category are freely soluble in water and, therefore, the HEDP anion is fully dissociated from its sodium or potassium cations when in solution. Under any given conditions, the degree of ionisation of the HEDP species is determined by the pH of the solution. At a specific pH, the degree of ionisation is the same regardless of whether the starting material was HEDP-H, HEDP (1-2Na), HEDP (2-3Na), HEDP-4Na, HEDP-xK or another salt of HEDP.
Therefore, when a salt of HEDP is introduced into test media or the environment, the following is present (separately):
In this context, for the purpose of this assessment, read-across of data within the HEDP Category is considered to be valid.
Gledhill and Feijtel (1992) Environmental properties and safety assessment of organic phosphonates used for detergent and water treatment applications. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Vol. 3, Part F, (Ed.: Hutzinger, O.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.