Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
18.9.1981 to 2.12.1981
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1981
Report date:
1981

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
- 2-Aminoanthracene was the only compound used to test the efficacy of the S9 mix; no independent repeat
GLP compliance:
no
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Ethylenebis(oxyethylene) bis[3-(5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-m-tolyl)propionate]
EC Number:
253-039-2
EC Name:
Ethylenebis(oxyethylene) bis[3-(5-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-m-tolyl)propionate]
Cas Number:
36443-68-2
Molecular formula:
C34H50O8
IUPAC Name:
ethane-1,2-diylbis(oxyethane-2,1-diyl) bis[3-(3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)propanoate]

Method

Target gene:
his/trp
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvr A
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, and 5000 µg/0.1 mL
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO.
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Test article was soluble at >= 5% in DMSO.
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other:
Remarks:
See Table 1.
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
- Exposure duration: Incubated for about 48 hours at 37 ºC in darkness.

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 petri dishes/strain/group
Evaluation criteria:
When the colonies had been counted, the arithmetic mean was calculated. The test substance is generally considered to be non-mutagenic if the colony count in relation to the negative control is not doubled at any concentration.
Statistics:
When the colonies had been counted, the arithmetic mean was calculated. No statistical analysis was performed.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: At the concentrations of 500 µg/0.1 mL and above the substance precipitated in soft agar.

Any other information on results incl. tables

In the experiments performed without and with microsomal activation, comparison of the number of histidine- or tryptophan-prototrophic mutants in the controls and after treatment with TK 12627 revealed no marked differences. The slight increase in the number of back-mutants observed in the experiment without activation on strain TA 1537 at the concentrations of 10 and 5000 µg/0.1 mL is attributed to fluctuations in the rate of spontaneously occurring back-mutants.

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

TA 98 TA 100 TA 1535 TA 1537 TA 1538 WP2uvrA
Dose (µg/0.1 ml) -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9
solvent control 33 41 174 156 19 19 6 10 21 40 21 26
5 32 64 144 146 16 11 7 7 17 35 23 25
10 29 62 161 147 12 11 12 8 24 41 20 26
50 31 45 167 142 17 12 6 10 19 40 17 27
100 33 42 152 153 15 7 9 8 23 35 17 24
500 24 52 152 156 12 12 7 13 21 33 20 28
1000 26 47 163 152 15 9 7 8 20 39 15 34
5000 15 38 157 153 12 18 12 8 22 26 13 24
positive controls:
solvent control 40 62 174 152 17 14 10 11 17 37 18 21
concentration A 249 160 2496 221 464 152 67 70 350 96 409 874
concentration B 394 277 593 277 42 431 606 157 707 160 1346 992

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
In the experiments performed without and with microsomal activation, comparison of the number of histidine- or tryptophan-prototrophic mutants in the controls and after treatment revealed no marked differences.